"To talk of many things:
Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
Of cabbages—and kings—
And why the sea is boiling hot—
And whether pigs have wings."
—Through the Looking-Glass
Slight correction
There’s got to be a morning after part A
Due Diligence-really!
My dad’s estate is over and done with. Sunday I leave for my 45th wedding anniversary cruise that should have happened in Je, but was just too busy to take. Enough with my excuses for being so far behind in my weaving. Life happens. All that said the piece still isn’t done! I need 3 days more.
I have been having a lot of fun with symbols and cultural Icons-first the broken puzzle, maze, the the 7x 7x7x7x7…, feathers, The scientific formula in the background, the rock wall, etc.
But, one of my favourites-- is this symbol.
According to one page source on the internet on iconic symbols in modern comic books it defines the moment of death, or of passing out of an idea, when drawn over the head of a comic strip character. It is an ideogram or icon used to convey an idea, a phantasy, or a wish a dream that is suddenly annihilated or destroyed by an
With this piece I wanted to use more silk and rayon. I was looking for- hoping for a little bit of a shimmer-Different then the way the cotton threads reflected or inter-reflect light. I also wanted
So I am back to tying over hand knots every 8 inches in the weft bundle. It’s a clumsy system as the hanging silk/rayon wefts tangle. It cuts down on speed as I sort through to find the one I wish to use. I have also discovered that I should always cut the loops of the weft bundles where I double back or fold the strands when doing the colour bundles. The loops catch and tangle everything I have tried wrapping the bobbin with the wefts that are knot, but they always make a mess of the silk or rayon when they unwind when I use my over the know trick so the bobbins don’t escape. (see page 30 in Tapestry 101 for how to use a bobbin)
Cheri White one of weaving buddies who comes to the studio just finished this tapestry. It’s fast becoming one of my favourite tapestries.Here it is just off the loom-not it’s official portrait-yet. Just a snap maybe some day she’ll write an explanation that I can share with everyone. I am totally in love with the imagery.
It’s fire weed season. I have decided to plant some in my yard. Fireweed always makes me thing of Edith Miller. I did a small wool tapestry of this in 1979(20x30inches and sold it to Edith Miller along time friend. She is the last person left alive in the group of 20 on going
Astoria Coastal Fiber Exhibit 2013
So this is a pet peeve and a rant. Ignore it if you wish. I am grateful that this show was done and acknowledge the amount of great work that went into it. It’s not just this exhibit but it seems to be a standard practice in every show I have been in in the last few years. Both my pieces were mounted in “Salon Style”and in away that did neither of the pieces justice. Every small format tapestry in the exhibit was hung one above the other.It always feels so disrespectful of the work. It made it really difficult to view some spectacular Small Format work that was in the exhibit. While larger pieces were given a space and hung in away that made them much easier to view and not double hung. Art work should be hung at eye level for the best view of a work of art. Not so high it can’t be seen or so low you have to stoop to see it. The argument is always it’s away to crowd more work into a smaller space. SO why do the small format pieces have to bear the brunt of crowding and bad spacing? I think its like saying the small format tapestry work isn’t important enough to have it’s own space. So be grateful it’s in the show no matter how it’s hung so we can have a proper look for the large format work. It feels like “ yeah, you can participate, but the small format work isn’t deserving of being viewed properly and so go sit in the back of the bus.” It always feels so disrespectful of the work-not just mine but all small format tapestry weavers. |
One of the many wonderful things I got to do this summer was visit the Cloisters after I taught at MAFA. I have around 200 detail shots of the tapestries not just the Unicorn tapestry. I am doing a lot of studying of those details and gleaning a lot of useful information from those shots. I am hoping to start organizing the materials in my journal when I get back from My Alaskan cruise. Those things that look hatches and hachures are not. They are woven i n the direction the warp travels. The tapestries were turned sideways when woven creating a sort of vertical hachure. Now that my remodel is done I am going to be offering classes in the studio. The first one on “Soumack and friends” will take place on November 2-4th of this year. The second one will be on Jan31-February 2 will be on colour blending and the use of Hatches, Hachures and their Cohorts.
Here’s a few of my favourite shots and details.
I have a plan for I am weaving next. I wanted to be free to start the pieces when I got back from Alaska-one involves a truck not making it through an under pass 2 blocks
The other incorporate black tree branches that looked lace in several pictures that I took near Hardin, Montana and photos that Trish Heath took that evening generously said I could use in my colour studies took of a smoky sunset in Albany with incredible colours that you don’t often see in Albany Sunsets. My camera was still packed at the time.
Still working on my research on soumack--
I have been scurrying through all my books and notes again because of a statement by a member of a list I am on. His comment was to the effect that the raised outlining and surface texture on many Coptic weavings was actually needlework that was applied after the textile was woven.
SO I quickly went raced back to several of my books to see if it was possible I had made a mistake. When I was teaching myself to do it I studied 4-5 fragments in the OSU collection and decided it had to be done as woven because the wraps never pierced a warp or weft and it always seemed to be controlled by the placement of the warps. The our other names for the flying shuttle technique are French Arrondiment and Ressaut or ressort. One book called it ressort and related it back to crappaud(Mary Rhodes book Small Woven Tapestries). All of the other books-The Coptic Tapestry Albums by Hoskins, Woven Structures, by Mallert and a new book The threads Course in Tapestry by Mette Lise Rossing.
I first read about the technique in Tapestry Mirror of History by Thomsen in the late 70’s and have had an ongoing fascination with it every since.
My research and theirs seem to verify that it was done by wrapping around warps as woven. Of course , they are mostly makers and not not museum curators. What I did note was that several major museums referred to it as an embroidery technique, but never said if the embroidery was applied after or as woven.
Flying Shuttle- The technique of carrying an extra weft thread of contrasting color on a supplementary shuttle, to create fine internal lines or pattern details. The flying shuttle thread is secured at intervals by catching it under a warp thread. A technique that appears unique to Coptic weaving.
Soumack: A supplemental, decorative stitch used for surface decoration and texture on Coptic tapestries. The soumack thread is wrapped around each warp, or group of warp threads, usually on a diagonal. Used to define lines, or create outlines.
I have run out of time again. So, hopefully, in 2 weeks I’ll be able to do another blog entry and have more information on my research into soumac
Cheers and all,
Kathe
Kathe